Judge nixes Oklahoma anti-sharia law.

This site has the most complete quotations from the judge that I have found. Notable are two oppposing considerations…

First, the judge says “that she agreed with a second argument [CAIR]Mr. Awad had made — that the definition of Shariah shifts depending on the country in which a Muslim lives and one’s individual beliefs..”

Yet later, she comments,

“…“While defendants contend that the amendment is merely a choice of law provision that bans state courts from applying the law of other nations or cultures, regardless of what faith they may be based on, if any, the actual language of the amendment reasonably, and perhaps more reasonably, may be viewed as specifically singling out Shariah law, conveying a message of disapproval of plaintiff’s faith,” the judge wrote..

So, the question she brings up, yet ignores, is:

Is shariah a nebulous, shifting concept from individual to individual? Or are muslims somehow united in shariah law, and it does not change from individual to individual?

You can’t have it both ways, ma’am. Unless you are just swallowing whole-hog the persuasive, shifting (!) lying arguments of the opposing counsel……

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s